speed camera Speed Cameras Dot Org
We support the abolition of cash for cameras schemes in the UK, the removal of speed cameras where accidents have not decreased, and refocusing of police resources to pursue the real menaces of the road: uninsured, unlicensed, or drunk / drug drivers and unregistered, untaxed, or poorly maintained vehicles.
 Home
 News
 Facts & Figures
 Discussion Forum
 Photos
 About
 Links
 Contact

Latest News
Cameras raked in £87m and still don’t work. Read more. 9-Jul-10 [source: Daily Mail]
Comment: Evidence continues to show that cameras still don't work.
Reader's Rage: 12345

Government pledge to end war on the motorist. Read more. 14-May-10 [source: Autocar]
Comment: Gone is the previous anti-motorist government and we welcome the new one who are making the right noises. Let's see if they can deliver on their pledges and if their message is heard by local authorities.
Reader's Rage: 12345

Conservatives to drop financial support for speed cameras. Manifesto says they will favour alternatives for more effective road safety such as vehicle activated signs.. 6-Apr-10 [source: Tory transport policy]
Comment: At last the promise of a rational road safety policy based on effectiveness and not financial greed. Vehicle activated signs have already proved to be more successful.
Reader's Rage: 12345

More news...

Speed camera that causes 42% more casualties
Published: 5th January 2009
Category: Location Issues, Crazy
Reader's Rage: 12345 [50votes]

A Gatso speed camera put up on the M11 in Essex to save lives has actually increased accidents by 19% and casualties by 42%. Police blamed motorists who slow down as they approach the camera and speed up again once past it. A spokesman from the Highways Agency said that accident data does not show a pattern of accidents which would be consistent with the camera itself being a factor.

However, the facts speak for themselves after a Freedom of Information request revealed that in the 5 years before the camera was put up there were 13 accidents and 14 casualties. In the following 5 years the accidents increased to 16 and casualties went up to 24. Therefore since the road was safer before the camera was in place it's fair to assume the existence of the camera is the main catalyst for the indisputable increase in accidents and casualties.

In February 2008 there was a 3 car pile up immediately in front of the camera adding further proof that the camera had something to do with the accident. It's accepted that accidents are caused by human error such as failing to pay attention to the road, misjudging other driver's intentions, etc, but in this case the camera appears to be an aggravating factor which has ensured more accidents are taking place than before it was put up.

Information sourced in part or in full from: Daily Mail

Our comment: Failure to remove this camera which clearly is the catalyst for the increased casualty rate would be final proof that authorities value revenue above human life.

Printer friendly version

Discussion Forum
Do you want to have your say about this news article? Head on over to our Discussion Forum and join in with existing conversations or start your own.



Speeding tickets or parking tickets - fight back!


Speedcameras.org is a UK site campaigning for fair & just law enforcement on British roads and policies that are not created to generate revenues but are made to increase safety based on open and reliable data. Please see our site policy and disclaimer.