speed camera Speed Cameras Dot Org
We support the abolition of cash for cameras schemes in the UK, the removal of speed cameras where accidents have not decreased, and refocusing of police resources to pursue the real menaces of the road: uninsured, unlicensed, or drunk / drug drivers and unregistered, untaxed, or poorly maintained vehicles.
 Home
 News
 Facts & Figures
 Discussion Forum
 Photos
 About
 Links
 Contact

Latest News
Cameras raked in £87m and still don’t work. Read more. 9-Jul-10 [source: Daily Mail]
Comment: Evidence continues to show that cameras still don't work.
Reader's Rage: 12345

Government pledge to end war on the motorist. Read more. 14-May-10 [source: Autocar]
Comment: Gone is the previous anti-motorist government and we welcome the new one who are making the right noises. Let's see if they can deliver on their pledges and if their message is heard by local authorities.
Reader's Rage: 12345

Conservatives to drop financial support for speed cameras. Manifesto says they will favour alternatives for more effective road safety such as vehicle activated signs.. 6-Apr-10 [source: Tory transport policy]
Comment: At last the promise of a rational road safety policy based on effectiveness and not financial greed. Vehicle activated signs have already proved to be more successful.
Reader's Rage: 12345

More news...

Speed gun victim cleared after 15 hearings and ?30,000 cost to public
Published: 28th January 2006
Category: Prosecution
Reader's Rage: 12345 [34votes]

David Jennings was finally cleared of speeding after a two year ordeal. In November 2003 he was recorded doing 60mph in a 30mph zone on the A379 in Devon. He was convinced he was innocent yet in August 2004 he was convicted in his absence after being wrongly told that he didn't need to attend court. He lost his license because as a new driver the disqualification limit is 6 points rather than 12.

His solicitor managed to quash the conviction and the case proceeded slowly towards trial. The CPS offered no evidence after they read a report by Dr Michael Clark, Europe's leading expert on laser speed guns. The LTI 20.20 gun was being operated inside a van by a civilian police worker and linked to a video camera. Dr Clarke studied the video and concluded the gun could not be relied upon.

The gun, according to Dr Clark, has got the distance wrong when measuring Mr Jenning's vehicle and this would have caused a significant speed error. The gun was faulty and the operator controlling it was not doing his job properly, said Dr Clark. "The machine is a load of rubbish". Kevin Delaney from the RAC called for the gun to be withdrawn pending the outcome of an independent inquiry.

The Home Office refused to comment. The CPS said the case was dropped only because of evidence that the roadside camera has not been adequately signposted.

Information sourced in part or in full from: Daily Mail

Our comment: Mr Jennings was brave enough to challenge the laser gun and win, but how many other drivers have been wrongly prosecuted?

Printer friendly version

Discussion Forum
Do you want to have your say about this news article? Head on over to our Discussion Forum and join in with existing conversations or start your own.



Speeding tickets or parking tickets - fight back!


Speedcameras.org is a UK site campaigning for fair & just law enforcement on British roads and policies that are not created to generate revenues but are made to increase safety based on open and reliable data. Please see our site policy and disclaimer.